Click to Login or Sign Up

Baptist Message

"Helping Louisiana Baptists Impact the World For Christ"

  • John 3:16
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Archive
  • Cartoons
    • Joe McKeever
    • Beyond the Ark
    • Church of the Covered Dish
    • Fletch
    • Preacher’s Kids
  • Contact
  • Louisiana
  • U.S. & Intl
  • Facts & Finds
  • Culture & Society
  • Editorial

AMA will explore policy change on assisted suicide

June 14, 2016

By Benjamin Clapper, Louisiana Right to Life

CHICAGO – At its annual meeting June 13, the American Medical Association (AMA) rejected a Louisiana State Medical Society proposal to reaffirm the AMA’s long-standing policy against physician assisted suicide.

Instead it approved a study-resolution to explore AMA adoption of a neutral position on physician assisted suicide, which was often referred to as “aid-in-dying” in the debate.

The study will be led by the AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, which will study a possible change to the AMA policy and report back with recommendations to the AMA Annual Meeting next year.

Dr. Jeff White, a member of the Louisiana State Medical Society and physician ally of Louisiana Right to Life, said the following after the AMA vote: “The AMA’s decision to study a possible change in position on doctor-prescribed suicide is very concerning for the future of the integrity of the medical profession. For millennia, the medical profession has been in unison that physicians prescribing death for their patients is antithetical to the mission of healing integral to the role of a physician.

“If the AMA changes it long-standing policy of opposition to doctor-prescribed suicide,” he said. “It will provide justification for proponents in their push to legalize this dangerous and uncontrollable policy.

“I encourage physicians, state medical societies, disability rights organizations, and all people concerned about the adverse consequences that could result from a change in the AMA’s policies to submit, at the appropriate time, their concerns to the AMA’s Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs,” said White. “A bad decision by AMA on this could have a lasting negative impact on how medicine is practiced, the doctor patient relationship of trust, and the true autonomy of underprivileged persons.”

Comments

Editorial

Apologetics 101: Part 9 (Old Testament bits and pieces)

By Will Hall, Baptist Message executive editor ALEXANDRIA, La. (LBM) – The first eight in­stallments of APOL­OGET­ICS 101 presented archae­ological discover­ies that supported the trust­worthiness of the Bible. NOT JUST RELICS However, it is import­ant to remember that the physical proof for most of … Read More

Search

  • Recent
  • Must Read

Recent

LCU to serve community during fall SENDLA

‘Evangelist to the stars’ to speak to YEC

Ninth Circuit protects historic Los Angeles cross and nativity

GBO helps share Christ with Vietnamese

Must Read

APOLOGETICS 101 (Part 8): The epic of Jonah is not a ‘fish tale’

APOLOGETICS 101 (Part 7): Israel’s powerful monarchy existed, and why it matters

APOLOGETICS 101 (Part 6): Jericho’s walls came tumbling down

APOLOGETICS 101 (Part 5): Evidence of the exodus

Copyright © 2026 · News Pro Theme 2.1 On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in